Obama doesn’t want you to see this video.
It contains information about his upbringing and whereabouts before his scant political career in Illinois. It shows some of the people he was associated with. Some names you know — Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright… some you do not — Frank Marshall Davis, an avowed communist. He says he attended Columbia and Harvard, but gives no proof; but did you know he visited Pakistan in 1981 with a Pakistani friend from Occidental college? He received thousands from Palestinians and their supporters toward his election (illegally!).
Sometimes I get information that just has to be put out there to become viral. Or in this case, viral again. The following vid was originally posted February 23, 2010 and then removed by FaceBook when it reached 1 million views. It has since been reposted by ResistNet on YouTube where I picked it up and share with you now. Unless People of good authority come forward with researched evidence to the contrary, I will not retract this post. (Given that FactCheck is fallacious, snopes is merely left-leaning so take their answers with a ‘handful’ of salt.)
My question is why this man is still in office? With this bit of vetting — compromised allegiances, buy offs, trips to terror-stricken lands and unsavory international alliances — how is this man any different than a terrorist? Why have the FBI and Homeland Security not acted on this information? What is being hidden from the American people???
The link may also be accessed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxb_vZe7Ao&feature=email -or here- http://www.resistnet.com/video/obama-doesnt-want-you-to-see-1.
Please post your comments here on the GetdClu blog. It’s important to discuss the constitutional options available to the American people.
http://ow.ly/1qBLSxSphere: Related Content
My dear mother cheetah, Publius-Huldah, gives some options available to us as Americans to remedy the govt's usurpations (http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/contact/ )
17.2
James Madison said in Federalist No. 44 (17th para), re usurpations by Congress, “…a remedy must be obtained from the people, who can, by the election of more faithful representatives, annul the acts of the usurpers.”
Yes, the ballot box is one remedy, but not our only remedy. Alexander Hamilton said in Federalist No. 33 (7th para) that acts of Congress which are not pursuant to the Constitution (Art. VI, cl. 2) are merely acts of usurpation and deserve to be treated as such, and:
“If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed [The Constitution], and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify.” (6th para)
What is Hamilton saying? Simply this: That We the People may do whatever We think we need to do to reign in a lawless usurping federal government. “Prudence” requires us to act intelligently & morally; and the “exigencies” require us to make our reaction appropriate to the usurpation & the circumstances.
That clearly understood, the remedies available to us include nullification by States, jury nullification, the ignoring of unconstitutional laws, regulations & orders by individuals, groups, local governments & States, “Tenth Amendment” resolutions with teeth, withdrawal of support, peaceful protests & rallies, & ultimately, but only as the absolute last resort, that remedy discussed by our James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution, and former President of these United States, in the Federalist No. 46 (7th – 9th paras).
Our prime task now is to educate & inform our fellow Citizens about our Constitution. Ignorance & statist ideology are doing us in! May God remove the scales from our eyes before things come to blows. PH
This is one of the most irresponsible things you've ever posted.
How's the ride with Osama? Or is the White Citizen's Council? And if a hoax, so easily disprovable, suckers you in so easily, can it be for any reason other than your own nefarious goals?
FBI doesn't release dossiers on active politicians, nor on active investigations. That's the first clue that it's complete bunk.
Occidental College has a special page answering the questions so stupidly asked in the video (you didn't bother to look; you didn't bother to look)
You could call Columbia to confirm Obama's attendance there. Lots of others have. You could call Harvard. For the sake of Jesus, he was president of the Harvard Law Review. Nobody but students get to write on to the law review, no one but an active student can even run for president of the organization.
Obama's birth certificate has been vetted much more than the drilling plans of any oil company.
Shame on you for posting this.
Rewind. Reboot. Time to retract.
Your response is exactly why I included you in the list of folks to whom I sent early notice of the post. Thanks for responding so quickly and, for you, politely. You failed to mention the Pakistan trip or the campaign donations from Palestinians and other foreign sources, or where the grant money went that was for the Annenberg school, just to bring up three rather significant points. Do you have some links or solutions for these issues as well?
Geez, you'd think with all of the millions of dollars spent by McCain to dig up dirt on Obama during the campaign, he'd have picked up on this and easily won the election by a landslide. Can anyone really be THIS gullible?
In 1951 Ray Bradbury wrote an anthology called The Illustrated Man and one of the stories in it, dealing with a space crew, was entitled "No Particular Night or Morning," in which one of the astronauts is so paranoid he refuses to believe anything is real unless he has evidence that will satisfy his exacting demands. This is exactly the tone of the video that allegedly the President doesn't want us to see. All these claims that there is no proof he was here, or there, or whatnot, except for the words of others and no documented proof in writing and so on, is nonsensical. It is propaganda of the worst order, the same sort of propaganda by which the German and Russian people were brainwashed under Hitler and Stalin.
You say that "[a]s President of the United States, Barack Obama's actions have … Threatened the U.S. Constitution; Weakened America's defenses; Encouraged our enemies; Irritated our closest allies; Moved us towards Socialism; Increased our budget deficit; Increased our national debt; Weakened our economy; Trivialized the War on Terror; Failed to meet his promises."
How so? You make the claim, you prove it. Otherwise stand accused as a liar.
Facebook removed the video? Good for them! Time for you to realize what a horrible mistake you've made and issue a public apology for all the lies about our President.
"At large" my foot.
I'd also say shame on you … but I doubt you have any.
Lisa if the video doesn't show up……..here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WedxY61d60&NR…
My recent post Obama Shamelessly Uses Oil Spill to Push Cap & Trade Bill That BP Wrote
Obama's grandparents were communists? He was a veteran of World War II, you ingrate. His mother was a banker. A banker. She was a successful, practicing capitalist.
Doesn't your own code of honesty require better truthfulness than that?
When obama visited Pakistan in 1981, what passport was he using?? The U.S. had imposed travel restrictions to that country making it impossible for obama to visit Pakistan during that year. You don't suppose he used his valid Indonesian, British or whatever passport do you??????
And exactly when did the United States impose such harsh travel restrictions on going to Pakistan in 1981? Again — you make the claim, the burden of proof is ON YOU. Show us your proof.
A U.S. passport. Look at history. Call the State Department. At no time has the U.S. ever suggested Americans not travel to Pakistan. In 1981, the U.S. was wooing Pakistan as an ally in the secret war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Travel restrictions would have discouraged that. (From that FactCheck site)
Were you even alive in the Reagan administration? You could at least look up in the history books to see who was our enemy, and who was our friend. You could try to validate that claim that Americans couldn't travel to Pakistan — you don't need to mindlessly repeat any old line of gossip passed in the beauty parlor or laundromat.
Sorry Ed….FactCheck is not a reliable source…….it is owned by the ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation a leftist organization. But I did research other sources and your right about the ban, but that doesn't matter. It is also possible Barry Soetoro (Obama) entered the country with an Indonesian passport.
Why would anyone seal up all their records and spend over $1 million to do so, if they had nothing to hide.
Mike, are you really that clueless? Or do you expect no one else knows anything?
You don't even know who Ambassador Annenberg was, do you. Nor do you know how the Annenberg Foundation is governed, nor its goals, nor do you have a clue how the Annenberg Public Policy Foundation is run.
To you, Attila the Hun is a "liberal," since he's from Europe.
We can figure out that Obama never held an Indonesian passport. Here are the legal arguments. Warning: that site has a bias toward accuracy — follow the links.
No Ed I'm not clueless as you are and I dont' have my head stuck in the sand as you do.
Look at Fact Check's sources for these so called "fact checks". They use sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press and ABC News. I have a new flash for you Ed, these sources are MSM and liberal.
In a 2005 Annenberg Public Policy Center poll of nearly 700 journalists, the liberal-to-conservative ratio was 3.4 to 1.
Maybe it's unwittingly, but that creates a liberal slat Ed…
Why would Obama seal up all their records and spend over $1 million to do so, if they had nothing to hide?
Mike complains:
And accurate, and in no need of making up stuff as you have.
Honesty goes a long way with me — they have it, you don't. As a consequence, I can't give you any credence.
Mike, I challenged you to document your false claim that Obama spent over $1 million on defense. I linked you to the guy who created that April Fools hoax. You repeat it, and repeat it. The Washington Post printing Janet Hook's fiction is more accurate than your being suckered in by an April Fool's hoax.
Obama's sealed nothing.
Why do you feel such a need to tell fantastic whoppers about Obama? Why isn't the truth good enough for you?
Whatever Ed……..your a know it all that just has to be right on everything…….
News Flash for ED….It is a known fact Obama has spent millions hiring lawyer to seal all of his records.
Why is Obama using fraudulent Social Security number!
I'm a know-little, not from Missouri, but adopting the Missouri Way: Show us the evidence. I check things out because I don't pretend to know everything. Don't take my word for it — check it out for yourself. Follow those links. Look for the information.
I did check it out Ed and gave you the links above. And while your at it Ed…..since Obama's records aren't sealed, why don't you check out his application for college and see if he applied as a 'foreign student' or an 'American citizen'…….since Obama's records aren't sealed you should be able to tell me that info pretty quick.
You are aware, I hope, that the "$1 million" legal defense spending figure was an April Fools hoax, right? The hoaxsters hoped to prove that birthers are so gullible they'll fall for anything, no matter how preposterous.
You complain that the Annenberg Public Policy Foundation, an organization bound by the laws of Pennsylvania to be non-partisan and impartial, is "liberal," and then you offer, without the courtesy of a link, an April Fools joke as evidence?
You just failed voir dire. We can only use competent witnesses.